Vithal S/O Madhukar Chavan v. The State Of Maharashtra Thr S.L.A.O Aurangabad And ANR

{1} ca8012.22.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8012 OF 2022 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 26851 OF 2021 Vithal s/o Madhukar Chavan Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & another Respondents WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8014 OF 2022 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 26847 OF 2021 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8013 OF 2022 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 26855 OF 2021 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8011 OF 2022 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 26858 OF 2021 AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8030 OF 2022 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 26715 OF 2021 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8031 OF 2022 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 26833 OF 2021 Mr. V. B. Wayal, advocate for the Applicant Mr. S. N. Kendre, Mr. A. B. Chate, AGPs for Respondent No.1. CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATE : 23rd February, 2023.

PC :

Heard rival submissions.

{2} ca8012.22.odt Respective applicants-claimants, in all these applications, are seeking condonation of delay of 2362 days which appears to be caused due to their fnancial crisis. The learned AGP strongly opposed the applications on the ground that the delay is not properly explained. The learned Counsel for the acquiring body, despite appearance, remained absent. She has not even fled her Vakalatnama. However, considering the statutory right of the applicants, the delay of 2362 days, in all these applications, stands condoned subject to the condition that the applicants shall not claim any interest for the aforesaid period of delay. The appeals be placed for admission after removal of offce objections, if any.

Civil Applications are disposed of.

(SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE adb