Shivshakti Pratishthan, Mahergaon v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

CP 96/14 & Ors.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 949 CONT. PETITION NO. 96 OF 2014 IN WP/2033/2013 SUYOG BAHUUDESHIYA SHAIKSHANIK SAMAJIK, SEVABHAVI SANSTHA, GONDUR

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Rudrawar S.G. AGP for Respondent/State : Mr. S.K. Shirse ...

950 CONT. PETITION NO. 98 OF 2014 IN WP/2049/2013 SHIVSHAKTI PRATISHTHAN, MAHERGAON

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Rudrawar S.G. AGP for Respondent/State : Mr. D.R. Korade ...

951 CONT. PETITION NO. 99 OF 2014 IN WP/2032/2013 SHIVSHAKTI PRATISHTHAN, MAHERGAON

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Rudrawar S.G. AGP for Respondent/State : Mr. V.K. Kotecha ...

952 CONT. PETITION NO. 100 OF 2014 IN WP/885/2013 FULE-AMBEDKAR BAHUUDESHIYA SHAIKSHANIK AND VIKAS SANSTHA, SHIRPUR

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Rudrawar S.G. AGP for Respondent/State : Mr. S.K. Shirse ...

CORAM

: ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.

CP 96/14 & Ors.

Dated : December 04, 2025 PER COURT :- 1.

The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that due to passage of time, the contempt petitions are rendered infructuous and nothing remained in the contempt petitions.

2.

The contempt petitions are disposed off.

( ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. ) ssc/