← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/5788/2022delay condonatedrejected

Ramnath Deorao Sagde v. The State Of Maharashtra Thr Collector, Jalna And ORS

2023-06-30Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More2 pages

902-CA-5788-2022 & 903

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 902 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5788 OF 2022 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 26896 OF 2021 RAMNATH DEORAO SAGDE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR COLLECTOR, JALNA AND OTHERS AND 903 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6068 OF 2022 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 25311 OF 2021 DATTU BAPURAO GAYKE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR COLLECTOR, JALNA AND OTHERS ...

Mr. D.M. Pingale - Advocate for Applicants Mr. S.S. Dande and Mr. B.V. Virdhe - AGP's for Respondent Nos.1 and 2 Mr. S.G. Bhalerao - Advocate for Respondent No.3 ....

CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATE : 30th June, 2023 PER COURT :

1.

Heard rival submissions.

2.

The respective applicants are seeking condonation of delay periods mentioned in these applications, which appear Pooja K.

1/2

902-CA-5788-2022 & 903 to be caused due to their poor financial condition. The learned counsel for the acquiring body and the learned A.G.P. strongly opposed the applications on the ground that, delay is not properly explained.

3.

However, considering the statutory right of the applicants and for the reasons stated in the applications, the applications are allowed and the delay periods mentioned therein stand condoned subject to condition that, the applicants shall not claim any interest for aforesaid periods of delay.

4.

The appeals be placed for admission after removal of office objections, if any.

5.

The applications are accordingly disposed of. [ SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE ] JUDGE Pooja K.

2/2