Dhananjay Bhaskar Patil v. Murlidhar Chintaman Patil And Others

1 911, 912,915-917

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 911 WRIT PETITION NO.11713 OF 2023 DHANANJAY BHASKAR PATIL

VERSUS

HIRABAI BHARMAL CHAVAN AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioner: Mr. Gore Ravindra Vitthal AGP for Respondent/State: Mr. K. B. Jadhavar Advocate for Respondent No.1:

Mr. R. N. Chavan h/f. Mr. V. A. Bagdiya ...

AND ...

912 WRIT PETITION NO.11714 OF 2023 DHANANJAY BHASKAR PATIL

VERSUS

NAJIYABI HANIF SHAIKH AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioner: Mr. Gore Ravindra Vitthal AGP for Respondent/State: Mr. K. N. Lokhande Advocate for Respondent No.1:

Mr. R. N. Chavan h/f. Mr. V. A. Bagdiya ...

AND ...

915 WRIT PETITION NO.11721 OF 2023 DHANANJAY BHASKAR PATIL

VERSUS

REKHABAI MUKESH JAIN AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioner: Mr. Gore Ravindra Vitthal AGP for Respondent/State: Mr. N. T. Bhagat Advocate for Respondent No.1:

Mr. R. N. Chavan h/f. Mr. V. A. Bagdiya ...

AND ...

916 WRIT PETITION NO.11722 OF 2023 DHANANJAY BHASKAR PATIL

2 911, 912,915-917

VERSUS

REKHABAI SUNIL PATIL AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioner: Mr. Gore Ravindra Vitthal AGP for Respondent/State: Mr. K. N. Lokhande Advocate for Respondent No.1:

Mr. R. N. Chavan h/f. Mr. V. A. Bagdiya ...

AND ...

917 WRIT PETITION NO.11723 OF 2023 DHANANJAY BHASKAR PATIL

VERSUS

MURLIDHAR CHINTAMAN PATIL AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioner: Mr. Gore Ravindra Vitthal AGP for Respondent/State: Mr. K. B. Jadhavar Advocate for Respondent No.1:

Mr. R. N. Chavan h/f. Mr. V. A. Bagdiya ...

CORAM :ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.

DATE :21st SEPTEMBER, 2023 PER COURT:

1.

Heard 2.

In all these matters, Mr. R. N. Chavan holding for Mr. V. A. Bagdiya, learned counsel appears for respondent no.1.

3.

By the impugned order the appellate authority - The Additional Divisional Commissioner, Aurangabad has set aside the orders

3 911, 912,915-917 of the Collector disqualifying respondent no.1 - member of grampanchayat.

4.

The matters are remitted back for fresh inquiry. The learned counsel for the appellant submits that in the first round two years time has been taken by the Collector to complete the inquiry, although, the statutory period is of 60 days.

5.

Having heard the parties, the Collector is directed to decide the remitted matters within a period of 60 days. The parties to appear before the Collector, on 03.10.2023, so as to enable the Collector to fix the further dates in the matters. Any unnecessary request for adjournment will not be entertained. If any report is called for from the concerned Block Development Officer, no separate notice be issued to the parties and the Collector also to fix the dates of the appearance of the parties before the Block Development Officer for conducting the spot inspection. The

4 911, 912,915-917 authority to scrupulously follow the time line and decide the remitted matters.

6.

All the writ petitions are disposed of with the above directions.

[ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.] marathe