Sunita W/O Rameshwar Aradle v. The State Of Maharashtra Thr Collector, Latur And ANR

(1) 929- CA-3074-2022.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 929 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3074 OF 2022 IN FAST/27062/2021 SUNITA W/O RAMESHWAR ARADLE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR COLLECTOR, LATUR AND ANR ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Ajinkya S. Deshpande h/f Mr. Deshpande Amit S.

AGP for Responden/State: Mr. D. J. Patil ...

CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATED : FEBRUARY 25, 2025 ORDER:- 1.

Heard rival submissions.

2.

The applicant is seeking condonation of delay of 3486 days in filing the First Appeal, which appears to be caused due to her poor financial condition.

3.

The learned A.G.P for respondent/Acquiring Body though strongly opposed the application, but considering the statutory right of the applicant, and the reasons mentioned in the application, it stands allowed in terms of prayer clause (B) subject to cost of Rs.4500/- (Rs. Four Thousand Five Hundred) to be deposited with Registry of this Court, for the utilization of High Court Dispensary of this Bench within two weeks.

(2) 929- CA-3074-2022.odt 4.

It is made clear that, the applicants shall not claim any interest and statutory benefits for the aforesaid period of delay on the enhanced compensation, if granted.

5.

Appeal be registered after deposit of cost and removal of office objections, if any.

6.

Application is disposed of.

(SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.) Y.S. Kulkarni