Ratansing Rupsing Girase v. The State Of Mahrashtra Through The S.L.A.O., Medium Pro., Dhule And Others

1 1092 & 1093 ca 16414-22

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 1092 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.16414 OF 2022 IN FAST/25303/2022 SINDHUBAI GOVINDSING GIRASE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE S.L.A.O., MEDIUMIRRIGATION PRO., DHULE ANDANR ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. B. K. Pawar h/f Mr. A. B. Kale AGP for Respondent No.1: Mr. S. N. Kendre ...

AND 1093 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.16415 OF 2022 IN FAST/25293/2022 RATANSING RUPSING GIRASE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHRASHTRA THROUGH THE S.L.A.O., MEDIUM PRO., DHULE AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. B. K. Pawar h/f Mr. A. B. Kale AGP for Respondent No.1: Mr. A. B. Chate ....

CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATED : 31/01/2023.

P. C. :

1.

Heard rival submissions.

2.

The respective applicants are seeking condonation of delay periods, which appear to be caused due to their poor financial condition. The learned AGP strongly opposed the

2 1092 & 1093 ca 16414-22 applications on the ground that delay is not properly explained.

3.

Considering the statutory right of the applicants, the applications are allowed and the delay periods in both these applications stand condoned subject to condition that the applicants shall not claim any interest for the periods of aforesaid delay.

4.

The appeals be placed for admission after removal of office objections, if any.

5.

The applications are accordingly disposed of. ( SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J. ) VS Maind/-