Hemantkumar Chandrakant Jain And Others v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2025:BHC-AUG:23267-DB 7-WP-11612-18.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 11612 OF 2018 Dr. Santosh Sunilrao Chouthaiwale and Others ..PETITIONERS

VERSUS

State of Maharashtra and Others ..RESPONDENTS WITH WP/11613/2018 WITH WP/11606/2018 WITH WP/11610/2018 WITH WP/11593/2018 WITH WP/11607/2018 WITH WP/11611/2018 WITH CA/2376/2024 IN WP/11612/2018 WITH WP/11609/2018 ....

Mr. A.C. Deshpande, Advocate for petitioners Mr. A.R. Kale, Addl.G.P. for respondent nos.1 to 4 Mr. R.R. Lute, Advocate h/f Mr. S.N. Lute, Advocate for respondent nos. 5 and 6 Mr. Girish Giri, Advocate h/f Mr. S.S. Tope, Advocate for respondent no.7 ....

CORAM : R.G. AVACHAT AND NEERAJ P. DHOTE, JJ.

DATE : 25th AUGUST, 2025 PER COURT :

1.

After hearing both the sides, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners would make a detailed representation by making reference to the relevant rules and judgments of this Court to Respondent No.3 - Director of Higher Education Department, who may be directed to take appropriate decision within stipulated period. 2.

Learned Addl.G.P. appearing for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 submits that appropriate order be passed.

1 / 2

7-WP-11612-18.odt 3.

In view of above, all the writ petitions stand disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to make appropriate detailed representation to Respondent No.3, who, on receipt of the same, shall consider the same and take appropriate decision on its own merits and in accordance with law within a period of four months. Civil application stands disposed of accordingly.

( NEERAJ P. DHOTE, J. ) ( R.G. AVACHAT, J. ) SSD 2 / 2