Lokhit Kala Va Krida Mandal Aurangabad Through Its Secretary Shaikh Gulam Rasul Katthu v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

9867.15WP

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 9867 OF 2015 LOKHIT KALA VA KRIDA MANDAL AURANGABAD THROUGH ITS SECRETARY SHAIKH GULAM RASUL K

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. Nagargoje Ankush N. AGP for Respondent/State : Mr. S.B. Yawalkar Advocate for Respondent no.4 : Mr. More Kailas U. ...

CORAM : S.S. SHINDE & P.R. BORA, JJ.

Dated: February 23, 2016 ...

PER COURT :- Heard. For the same reasons which are assigned by this Court while disposing of the Writ Petition No. 6328 of 2012 (Mai Mahila Va Bal Vikas Shikshan Sanstha, Deulgaon (Ghat), Tq. Ashti, Dist. Beed Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others with connected Writ Petitions thereto, decided on 24/09/2013, the impugned order dated 7th May, 2012, which is annexed at Exhibit-E page 51 of the compilation of the Writ Petition, is quashed and set aside. Recommendations made by University are placed back before Respondent No.1 State Government, for its fresh consideration. However, as in reply affidavit, some lacunae have been pointed out, we direct the Respondent No.4 University again to verify the claim made in the proposals and submit its report to Respondent No.1 - State

9867.15WP Government, if necessary, respondent No.4 University may charge reasonable processing fees again from petitioners. The report of the University shall reach respondent No.1 within two months from today. After such report is received, Respondent No.1 shall hear the petitioner and take necessary decision within a further period of three months. 2.

We are imposing this time limit only to see that, in case State Government grants necessary permission, the senior college should be in a position to start functioning at least from next academic year i.e. 2016-2017. 3.

The Writ Petition stands disposed of.

( P.R. BORA, J. ) ( S.S. SHINDE, J. ) ...

SGA