Chandrakant Umakantrao Hulsurkar v. The Commissioner Of Handicap Welfare Maharashtra State Pune And Others

915.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 915 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12858 OF 2016 IN WP/6434/2015 CHANDRAKANT UMAKANTRAO HULSURKAR

VERSUS

THE COMMISSIONER OF HANDICAP WELFARE MAHARASHTRA STATE PUNE AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Applicants : Mr. Joshi Milind M. AGP for Respondents State: Mr. S. B. Pulkundwar Advocate for Respondent No.5 :Mr. U. R. Awate Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr. U. B. Bondar

CORAM

: S. V. GANGAPURWALA & K. L. WADANE, JJ.

DATE :

23rd September, 2016 ORDER:

1.

Heard Mr. Joshi, the learned counsel for the applicant. Learned counsel Mr. Awate, Mr. Bondar and learned AGP for the non-applicants.

2.

Learned counsel for the non-applicants oppose the application. Writ petition is not yet admitted. Even otherwise, the non-applicants will have every right to controvert the averments sought to be introduced by way of amendment by filing affidavit to the writ petition. In the light of that, the civil application for amendment is allowed in terms of prayer clause B. Civil application disposed of. Necessary amendments be carried out within 14 days.

(K. L. WADANE, J.) (S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ) JPC