Dinesh Harischandra Momale And Others v. Pandurang Bhuja Waghmare And Others

17-CA-8510-2019.odt -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8510 OF 2019 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 12872 OF 2016 DINESH S/O. HARISHCHANDRA MOMALE AND ORS.

VERSUS

PANDURANG S/O BHUJA WAGHMARE AND ORS.

...

Advocate for Applicants: Mr. Mahesh S. Deshmukh Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3: Mr. S.V. Chandole AGP for Respondent Nos. 4 to 6: Mr. A.B. Chate Advocate for Respondent Nos.7 and 8: Mr. Ajinkya Readdy ...

CORAM : V. K. JADHAV, J.

DATED : 25th NOVEMBER, 2019 PER COURT :- 1.

Learned counsel appearing for the original petitioners in this writ petition, on instructions, submits that the petitioners are having no objection if the civil application is allowed. Learned counsel submits that though the applicants in the civil application were not party respondents in original proceedings, however, in terms of the order passed by the Minister and since they are in possession of land in dispute, the petitioners in the writ petition are having no objection to add them as party respondents in this writ petition. 2.

In view of the above and for the reasons stated in the civil application, the civil application is allowed in terms of prayer clause 'B'. The civil application is accordingly disposed off.

(V. K. JADHAV, J.) Sam..