← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/2619/2021disposed off

Mehtab Magan Chavan v. The Ex. Engineer, Minor Irrigation Division No. 1 Aurangabad Thr G.M.I.D.C., Aurangabad And Another

2021-03-02Hon'Ble Shri Justice R. G. Avachat3 pages

1 913(a)-ca-2617-2021+.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2617 OF 2021 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.530 OF 2020 Ganesh Morsing Chavan ... Applicant

Versus

The Executive Engineer Minor Irrigation Division No.1 and another ... Respondents CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2618 OF 2021 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.529 OF 2020 Shevantabai Bhagchand Rathod ... Applicant

Versus

The Executive Engineer Minor Irrigation Division No.1 and another ... Respondents CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2619 OF 2021 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 528 OF 2020 Mehtab Magan Chavan ... Applicant

Versus

The Executive Engineer Minor Irrigation Division No.1 and another ... Respondents CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2620 OF 2021 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 527 OF 2020 Chandarsing Parasram Chavan ... Applicant

Versus

The Executive Engineer Minor Irrigation Division No.1 and another ... Respondents

2 913(a)-ca-2617-2021+.doc CIVIL APPLICATION 2626 OF 2021 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.525 OF 2020 Devkabai Shivraj Chavhan (Died) Through the legal heirs 1-A] Shivraj Hansraj Chavhan and others ... Applicants

Versus

The Executive Engineer Minor Irrigation Division No.1 and another ... Respondents CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2623 OF 2021 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.535 OF 2020 Ashabai Ganesh Chavan ... Applicant

Versus

The Executive Engineer Minor Irrigation Division No.1 and another ... Respondents CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2628 OF 2021 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 534 OF 2020 Deva Harlal Rathod (Died) Through Legal heirs 1] Lilabai Deva Rathod and others ... Applicants

Versus

The Executive Engineer Minor Irrigation Division No.1 and another ... Respondents ....

Mr. D. A. Bide, Advocate h/f Mr. V. B. Wayal, Advocate for the applicants Mr. S. G. Bhalerao, Advocate for respondent No.1 Mr. A. B. Chate, AGP for the State ....

CORAM : R. G. AVACHAT, J.

DATED : 02nd MARCH, 2021

3 913(a)-ca-2617-2021+.doc PER COURT :- .

Heard.

2.

Considering the challenge made to the judgment and award passed by the Reference Court, the applicants are permitted to withdraw the amount deposited in this Court to the extent of 50% on furnishing undertaking and further permitted to withdraw to the extent of 25% on furnishing solvent surety to the satisfaction of the Registrar (Judicial) of this Court and remaining 25% of the amount shall be kept in fixed deposit in any Nationalised Bank. 3.

The civil applications are accordingly disposed of. [ R. G. AVACHAT, J. ] SMS