Ali Haidar Khan Ajmal Khan v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

983-wp-11655-2021.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.11655 OF 2021 Ali Haidar Khan Ajmal Khan

...Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and Others

...Respondents

...

Ms. Surekha P. Mahajan, Advocate for Petitioner. Mr. P.K. Lakhotiya, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 to 3. Mr. P.D. Bachate, Advocate for Respondent Nos.4 & 5. ...

CORAM : R.D. DHANUKA & S.G. MEHARE, J.J.

DATED : 08th MARCH, 2022 PER COURT:- 1.

Petitioner and respondent no.4 have filed compromise deed before this Court on 21.02.2022. The State Government is not party to the said compromise deed.

2.

Mr. Bachate, the learned counsel for respondent nos.4 and 5 submits that from the date of reinstatement of the petitioner on 04.10.2021 till the petitioner takes voluntary retirement in terms of the compromise deed, dues payable to the petitioner will have to be borne by the State Government. He states that his client would submit salary bills to the State Government for reimbursement. Statement is accepted. The State Government is directed to consider the said pay bills in accordance with the law and shall release the payment, if any, 1/2

983-wp-11655-2021.odt payable within eight weeks from the date of the respondent nos.4 and 5 submitting pay bills.

3.

In so far as the payment demanded by the petitioner from the date of termination i.e. 01.06.2021 till the date of reinstatement i.e. 04.10.2021 is concerned, the petitioner and respondent no.4 would abide by the compromise deed and the other terms as may be agreed between the parties after disposal of this petition. 4.

Writ Petition is disposed off in aforesaid terms. There shall be no order as to costs.

(S.G. MEHARE. J.) ( R.D. DHANUKA, J.) Mujaheed// 2/2