← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/10490/2017disposed offdismissed for default

Sapna Ashokrao Attamwad v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2017-11-03Hon'Ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala,Hon'Ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi4 pages

1 wp 10483.17

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 10483 OF 2017 Riddhi Balaji Kanthewad .. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 10484 OF 2017 Vishal Baswant Muttepod .. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 10485 OF 2017 Girish Balwantrao Pakalwad .. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 10486 OF 2017 Jagdish Sunil Fulewad .. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 10487 OF 2017 Tadvi Albeena Jaweed .. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents

2 wp 10483.17 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 10488 OF 2017 Akshaykumar Ravikumar Chatlawar Minor through his father R. G. Chatlawar .. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 10489 OF 2017 Pallavi Rajendra Kolhe .. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 10490 OF 2017 Sapna Ashokrao Attamwad .. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 10491 OF 2017 Dipali Babasaheb Ghadge .. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 10492 OF 2017 Priyanka Balasaheb Mittewad .. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents

3 wp 10483.17 Shri Sunil M. Vibhute, Advocate for Petitioners in all matters. Shri P. S. Patil, Addl.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 in all matters.

Shri Jayant R. Patil, Advocate for Respondent No. 4 in W. P. No. 10484/2017 and W. P. No. 10487/2017.

Shri K. M. Suryawanshi, Advocate for the Respondent No. 4 in W. P. No. 10485/2017.

Shri Anandsing Bayas, Advocate for the Respondent No. 4 in W. P. No. 10488/2017 and W. P. No. 10489/2017.

Shri Shrikant Patil, Advocate for the Respondent No. 4 in W. P. No. 10490/2017 and W. P. No. 10491/2017.

Shri Chandrakant A. Jadhav, Advocate for the Respondent No. 4 in W. P. No. 10492/2017.

CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI, JJ.

DATE : 03RD NOVEMBER, 2017.

FINAL ORDER :

.

In all these matters, the validation proceedings in respect of caste/tribe claims of the petitioners are pending with the respondent/Committee.

2.

Mr. Vibhute, the learned counsel for petitioners submits that, the petitioners have been given admission to the Ist year M.B.B.S./B.D.S./Physiotherapy/B. Sc. Nursing courses conducted by the Maharashtra University of Health Sciences Nashik. The respondents are not permitting the petitioners to prosecute their further studies and appear in the examination only on the ground that validation proceedings are pending. 3.

We have heard the learned counsel for respective

4 wp 10483.17 respondents.

4.

In view of the fact the validation proceedings in respect of caste/tribe claims of the petitioners are pending, we pass following order.

5.

The Scrutiny Committee shall decide the validation proceedings in respect of caste/tribe claims of the petitioners expeditiously and preferably within a period of nine (09) months from today. The petitioners shall co-operate in expeditious disposal of the said proceedings. The petitioners shall appear before the Committee on 22nd November, 2017.

6.

The petitioners shall file an undertaking with the respective institutions that, in case their caste/tribe claims are invalidated, then they would pay the full fees for the period they have undertaken the course. The respondent/institutions can take further course of action against the petitioners in pursuance to the judgment that would be delivered by the Committee in the validation proceedings. Till the validation proceedings are decided, the respondents shall not refrain the petitioners from prosecuting their studies and from appearing in the examination and declaration of results, if they are otherwise eligible. The writ petitions are disposed of. No costs.

[SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI,J.] [S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.] bsb/Nov. 17