Gangadhar Manikchand Pardeshi And Others v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Secretary And Others

8-9-WP-9921-2022+ -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 8 WRIT PETITION NO. 9921 OF 2022 ANJALI ASHOK WADGAONKAR AND ANOTHER

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS 9 WRIT PETITION NO. 9922 OF 2022 GANGADHAR MANIKCHAND PARDESHI AND OTHERS

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY AND OTHERS .....

Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. Balaji S. Shinde AGP for Respondent nos. 1 and 2 : Mr. P. S. Patil Advocate for Respondent Nos. 3 and 4 : Mr. S. B. Ghute .....

CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE AND ARUN R. PEDNEKER, JJ.

DATED : 26 SEPTEMBER 2022 PER COURT :- 1.

The petitioners in both the petitions have put forth prayer clause [B] as under :- [B]By issuing writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or directions in the like nature, respondents no. 3, Chief Executive Officer may kindly be directed to consider and decide claims/representations of the petitioners annexed at EXH-C in the light of circular dtd 28.06.2018 issued by respondent no.1, for changing the postings of the petitioners by opening the posts of compulsory vacancies.

8-9-WP-9921-2022+ -2-

2. The learned Advocate representing respondent Nos. 3 and 4 submits on instructions that the representation put forth by the petitioners dated 28.06.2018 would be decided by the respondents within four weeks.

3.

In view of the above, the petitioners are satisfied. 4.

These petitions are, therefore, disposed off. 5.

Respondent Nos. 3 and 4 should respond to the representation within four weeks and convey the decision to the petitioners, on or before 21st October, 2022, in the light of the circular dated 28.06.2018.

[ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.] [RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.] vre