Sukdeo Narayan Rathod v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.10084 OF 2015 Sukdeo S/o Narayan Rathod Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others.

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.

Court's or Judge's orders Mr.D.B.Thoke, advocate for the petitioner.

Mr.B.V.Virdhe, A.G.P. for the State.

Mr.A.V.Hon, advocate for Respondent No.4.

Mr.R.J.Godbole, advocate for Respondent No.5. Mr.A.S.Radikar, advocate for Respondent No.6. CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA AND K.L.WADANE,JJ.

Date : 25.08.2016.

PER COURT :

1.

Heard.

2.

Mr.Hon, Mr.Godbole and learned A.G.P. raise a preliminary objection that the petitioner has a remedy before the School Tribunal U/s 9 of the MEPS Act.

3.

In light of that, though Mr.Thoke, learned counsel sought to canvass submissions on merits, we are not inclined to consider the same.

4.

The Writ Petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail alternate remedy.

5.

All contentions kept open.

6.

The forum where the proceedings would be filed, would consider the time spent in prosecuting the present Writ Petition. 7.

The Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

(K.L.WADANE,J.) (S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.) Dt.25.08.2016.

asp/office/wp10084.15