Chandrakant Venkatrao Patil v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2025:BHC-AUG:6933-DB

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD.

931 CONT. PETITION NO. 627 OF 2016 IN WP/5229/2015 Chandrakant Venkatrao Patil ....Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and Others .....Respondents .....

Petitioner - Party In Person Shri. S. J. Salgare, AGP for the Respondent / State. Shri. S. G. Rudrawar, Advocate for Respondent No.4 .....

WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1014 OF 2025 IN CP/627/2016 .....

CORAM : R. G. AVACHAT AND NEERAJ P. DHOTE, JJ.

Dated : MARCH 7, 2025 PER COURT :- .

This Contempt Petition is filed by Party-in-person for non compliance of the order dated 05.01.2016. We have heard Party-in-person for some time. He draws our attention to the order dated 05.01.2016 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.5229 of 2015. The relevant part of the said order reads as under :- "11. Though the petitioner has vehemently argued that, the Respondent No.4 has no authority to pass the impugned order, in view of subsequent event of terminating the services of the petitioner, in our considered view, points raised in this petition so far as order of termination is concerned, can be raised by the petitioner before the School Tribunal and same can be considered by the said Forum. In that view of the matter, and since the management has passed the order dated 31st August, 2014, bearing outward No. V.V.E.S.L.

/254/2015, terminating the services of the petitioner, it will be open for the petitioner to avail remedy of appeal under Section 9 of the Act of 1977, before School Tribunal.

consider the said appeal on merits, as if the said appeal is filed within a period of limitation."

2.

We informed the Petitioner Party-in-person that there are no directions of this Court of which there is non compliance. We informed him that the Contempt Petition would not lie. He submits that appropriate orders be passed.

3.

After going through the said order dated 05.01.2016, it is clear that there were no order / directions of this Court to any Authority and therefore, there is no question of non compliance. Hence, the Contempt Petition stands disposed of. 4.

Pending Civil Application, if any, stands disposed of. ( NEERAJ P. DHOTE, J. ) ( R. G. AVACHAT, J. ) GGP Signed by: Gajanan G. Punde Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 11/03/2025 11:53:52