← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/10120/2016disposed offdismissed for default

The State Of Maharashtra And Others v. Madhukar Ananda Patil And Others

2016-10-07Hon'Ble Shri Justice R. M. Borde,Hon'Ble Shri Justice P.R. Bora3 pages

{1}

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.10120 OF 2016 1 The State of Maharashtra, through Secretary, Agriculture Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai-32 & others Petitioners

Versus

Madhukar Ananda Patil & others Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.10121 OF 2016 1 The State of Maharashtra, through Secretary, Agriculture Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai-32 & others Petitioners

Versus

Sanjay Pundlik Deore Respondent WITH WRIT PETITION NO.10122 OF 2016 1 The State of Maharashtra, through Secretary, Agriculture Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai-32 & others Petitioners

Versus

Ramesh Vamanrao Pawar Respondent WITH WRIT PETITION NO.10123 OF 2016 1 The State of Maharashtra, through Secretary, Agriculture Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai-32 & others Petitioners

{2}

Versus

Parshuram Sitaram Bramhne & others Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.10124 OF 2016 1 The State of Maharashtra, through Secretary, Agriculture Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai-32 & others Petitioners

Versus

Arun s/o Pandit Patil Respondent Mr.A.B.Girase, Government Pleader for petitioners. CORAM : R.M.BORDE & K.K.SONAWANE, JJ.

DATE : 07th October, 2016 PER COURT:

These petitions are not pressed on behalf of the petitioner-State and the only request, that is made, is to direct the Tribunal to decide pending Original Applications expeditiously. It is also pointed out that at present Division Bench is not available at the Aurangabad Bench of the Tribunal for dealing with the matters.

It would be open for the petitioners to make suitable application to the learned Chairman, Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal, for constitution of a Division Bench at Aurangabad or for transfer of matters to Mumbai. If such an application is made,

{3} learned Chairman may consider the same and looking to the facts of the case, and prescribe the matters for early hearing. We direct the Tribunal to decide the matters as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of four months from today.

With the direction as above, Writ Petitions are disposed of.

K.K.SONAWANE R.M.BORDE JUDGE JUDGE adb/wp1012016