Sachin Uttam Gajbhar v. The State Of Maharashtra

2024:BHC-AUG:22944 928-BA-1613-24.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1613 OF 2024 SACHIN UTTAM GAJBHAR

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. C. C. Deshpande holding for Mr. Balasaheb N. Magar APP for Respondent : Ms. Vaishali S. Chaudhari ...

CORAM : S. G. MEHARE, J.

DATE : 26-09-2024 PER COURT :- 1.

After hearing the learned counsel for the applicant, the Court is of the view that there is no substantial change in the circumstances and the role of the applicant is not identical to the role of co-accused - Kashinath Ambaji Gaikwad. Hence, he does not deserve bail. The learned counsel for the applicant, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the application. Leave granted.

2.

The bail application stands dismissed as withdrawn. ( S. G. MEHARE ) JUDGE rrd