Xyz v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

903apeal829-19 JPChavan

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 903 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.829 OF 2019 XYZ

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR ...

Advocate for Appellant :Mr. Shelke Manoj U.

APP for Respondent State: Mr. R. V. Dasalkar Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr. V. B. Deshmukh

CORAM

: SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI & Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, JJ.

DATE :8th March, 2023 ORDER:

1.

Learned Advocate for the appellant is absent. He was absent on 8th February, 2023 also. He has not carried out the amendment as directed in the said order. It was also made clear in that order that if he remains absent on the next date, the appeal is liable to be dismissed. 2.

Now, no reasonable ground has been shown for the absence of learned Advocate for the appellant. In view of the same, it appears that the appellant is not keen to go ahead with the matter. 3.

The appeal stands dismissed.

(Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J.) (SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI, J. )