Pandharinath Eknath Jadhav v. The State Of Maharashtra And Another

2025:BHC-AUG:31647 26.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

BENCH AT AURANGABAD.

26 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11172 OF 2014 IN FAST/26964/2014 ABDUL RAHEMAN SK. BANNU SINCE DECEASED THROUGH HIS LRS ALMNOORBEE SK. ABDUL RAHEMAN AND OTHERS

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Charudatta K. Sonawane & Mr. N. R. Thorat. AGP for Respondent / State : Mr. S. B. Jadhav. ...

AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11176 OF 2014 IN FAST/26936/2014 AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11175 OF 2014 IN FAST/26956/2014 AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11169 OF 2014 IN FAST/26962/2014 AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11174 OF 2014 IN FAST/26958/2014 AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11173 OF 2014 IN FAST/26960/2014 ...

CORAM :

SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.

DATE :

17th November, 2025.

P.C.:

Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

Applications for condonation of delay:

These applications are for condonation of delay of 707 days caused in filing the first appeals.

26.odt The learned AGP strongly opposed the applications and submitted that there is no sufficient reason to condone the delay. On perusal of the applications, it appears that the delay has not been deliberately caused. Therefore, in the interest of justice, the delay deserves to be condoned on certain conditions. For the reasons stated in the applications, the delay stands condoned. The applications stand allowed in the interest of justice. The appeals be registered.

It is made clear that in case the amount of compensation is enhanced, the appellants shall not be entitled for the amount of interest for the delayed period.

[ SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. ] nga