Pankaj Gopalrao Patil v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS

{1} ca267522.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2675 OF 2022 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 26604 OF 2019 Pankaj s/o Gopalrao Patil Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & others Respondents Ms. Aparna Sapate, advocate holding for Mr. S. S. Shinde, advocate for the Applicant Mr. P. N. Kutti, AGP for Respondents No. 1 & 2.. CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, JJ.

DATE : 28th July, 2022.

PC :

Heard learned Counsel for the applicant (original claimant) as also learned AGP for Respondents No.1 & 2. Respondent No.3 - acquiring body, despite service of notice, remained absent.

The applicant has fled the appeal for enhancement of compensation amount and there is delay of 466 days. As such, for the reasons stated in the application, it stands allowed and the delay of 466 days stands condoned subject to the condition that

{2} ca267522.odt the applicant shall not claim any interest for the aforesaid period of delay.

The appeal be placed for admission after removal of offce objections, if any.

(SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE adb