← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/864/2013application allowed

Sakubai Bhaginath Bahirav. v. Yadav Punja Salave Died Thr Lrs Sakharabai And ORS

2023-03-16Hon'Ble Shri Justice R. M. Joshi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 864 OF 2013 IN SA/327/1996 WITH CA/3780/1996 IN SA/327/1996 SAKUBAI BHAGINATH BAHIRAV

VERSUS

YADAV PUNJA SALAVE DIED THR LRS SAKHARABAI AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. P.V. Mandlik Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1A, 1-B-I, 1-C, 1-D, 1-E & 3 : Mr. B.A. Dhengle ...

CORAM : R.M. JOSHI, J.

DATE : 16th March, 2023 PER COURT :

1.

This application is for condonation of delay for bringing LRs of deceased respondent no. 1-B - Kachru Salve on record and set aside abatement with further prayer to bring names of LRs in the array of respondents.

2.

Learned counsel for the applicant states that on the basis of the report of service of notice to respondent no. 1-B, it was revealed that the respondent is dead and, therefore, for want of exact date of death of respondent the period of delay could not be calculated.

3.

Learned counsel for the proposed respondents i.e. legal heirs of 1/2

respondent nos. 1-B has not disputed the fact of death of deceased respondent no. 1-B.

4.

Considering the reasons mentioned in the application, application is allowed in terms of prayer clause 'b-i to b-iii'. 5.

Amendment be carried out within a period of two weeks. [ R.M. JOSHI, J. ] SPChauhan 2/2