Ajay Arun Jadhav v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

WP.10249-18.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 2 WRIT PETITION NO. 10249 OF 2018 AJAY ARUN JADHAV

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Mr. P.R.Katneshwarkar h/f Mr. S.R.Andhale, Advocate for Petitioner.

Mr. S.B.Yawalkar, AGP for Respondent­State.

Mr. P.S.Shendurnikar, Advocate for Respondent No.2. Mr. M.D.Narwadkar, Advocate for Respondent No.3. Mr. A.P.Bhandari, Advocate for Respondent Nos.4 & 5. ...

CORAM :

R.M.BORDE AND MANGESH S. PATIL, JJ.

DATE :

15.10.2018 PER COURT :­ 1.

The petitioner is stated to have tendered an application to the Fees Regulating Authority relating to permissibility to compute the fees which according to the petitioner is in violation of Section 6 of the Maharashtra Unaided Private Professional Educational Institutions (Regulation of Admissions and Fees) Act, 2015. The concerned authority shall dispose of the application in accordance with the provisions of law, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six weeks from today. It is clarified that the objections raised by the petitioner in the instant petition

WP.10249-18.odt as well as by the respondents are specifically kept open for consideration by the concerned authority. It is also clarified that we have not commented upon or applied our mind as regards the jurisdiction of the concerned authority to deal with the applications or representations.

2.

In view of the above, the Writ petition stands disposed of.

(MANGESH S. PATIL, J.) (R.M.BORDE, J.) ...

vmk/­