Arif Mohhamad Khan S/O. Niyaz Mohhamad Khan And ANR v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

2025:BHC-AUG:26518-DB 905-appln-2833-2019.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 905 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2833 OF 2019 1.

Arif Mohhamad Khan s/o Niyaz Mohhamad Khan 2.

Aejaz Mohammed Khan s/o Niyaz Mohammed Khan .. Applicants

Versus

1.

State of Maharashtra Through the Police Inspector, Jinsi Police Station, Dist. Aurangabad.

2.

Samina Begum Javed Ahemed .. Respondents ...

Mr. Avinash Patil h/f Mr. A. K. Bhosale, Advocate for Applicants. Mr. A. M. Phule, APP for Respondent No.1/State. Mr. Sohel E. Siddiqui, Advocate for Respondent No.2. ...

CORAM : SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI & HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, JJ.

DATE : 24 SEPTEMBER 2025 ORDER :

.

Learned Advocate Mr. Avinash Patil holding for learned Advocate Mr. A. K. Bhosale seeks accommodation. However, the learned APP informs that the matter has proceeded before the trial Court. Prosecution evidence was closed on 09.07.2025. Thereafter, statement under Section 313 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been recorded and the matter is now for final arguments.

[1]

905-appln-2833-2019.odt 2.

When the matter has travelled to almost last stage, we do not find this to be a fit case where we should exercise our powers under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The application stands dismissed.

[ HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR ] [ SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI ] JUDGE JUDGE scm [2]