← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/10232/2010disposed offdismissed for default

The Branch Manager Tap Co Op Credit Society Ltd Chopda And ORS v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS

2016-03-16Hon'Ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala,Hon'Ble Shri Justice A. I. S. Cheema3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.10232 OF 2010 The Branch Manager Tapi Co-operative Credit Society Ltd., Chopda and others ...

PETITIONERS

VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra & others ...

RESPONDENTS .....

Shri S.S. Jadhavar, Advocate for petitioners Shri P.N. Kutti, A.G.P. for State .....

W I T H WRIT PETITION NO.10242 OF 2010 Vasudeo Rajaram Wani and others ...

PETITIONERS

VERSUS

The Union of India & others ...

RESPONDENTS .....

Shri G.V. Wani, Advocate for petitioners Shri S.B. Deshpande, Assistant Solicitor General for Union of India Shri P.N. Kutti, A.G.P. for State .....

W I T H WRIT PETITION NO.10261 OF 2010

Manohar Eknath Saraf and others ...

PETITIONERS

VERSUS

The Union of India & others ...

RESPONDENTS .....

Shri G.V. Wani, Advocate for petitioners Shri S.B. Deshpande, Assistant Solicitor General for Union of India Shri P.N. Kutti, A.G.P. for State .....

W I T H WRIT PETITION NO.10262 OF 2010 Dilip Eknath Bobade ...

PETITIONER

VERSUS

The Union of India & others ...

RESPONDENTS .....

Shri G.V. Wani, Advocate for petitioner Shri S.B. Deshpande, Assistant Solicitor General for Union of India Shri P.N. Kutti, A.G.P. for State .....

CORAM:

S.V. GANGAPURWALA AND A.I.S. CHEEMA, JJ.

DATED:

16th March, 2016.

ORAL ORDER :

1.

On 11th March 2016, we had passed the following order :

".

When the matter is called out, the learned counsel for the petitioner is absent.

2.

The issue involved in the present writ petition is already concluded by virtue of judgment of the Division Bench of this Court reported in the case of Mandatai Sambhaji Pawar and another Vs. State of Maharashtra and others reported in 2011(4) Mh.L.J. 790.

3.

However, as the learned counsel for the petitioner is absent, place the writ petition for final hearing on 16.03.2016."

2.

In light of the above, the writ petitions are disposed of. Rule discharged. No costs. The interim orders passed earlier would continue for a period of four weeks from today. In case the proceedings are pending before the Consumer Forum, the petitioners may take appropriate steps in the said proceedings. (A.I.S. CHEEMA, J.) ( S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J.) fmp/wp10232.10