Swapnil Deepak Thakur v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

1 925-CA-10438-2019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.10438 OF 2019 IN WP/8538/2019 SWAPNIL DEEPAK THAKUR ...APPLICANT

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENTS Mr. S.C. Yeramwar, Advocate for Applicant Mr. P.S. Patil, Additional Government Pleader for Respondents-State Mr. S.G. Karlekar, Advocate for Respondent No. 3 CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA AND ANIL S. KILOR, JJ.

DATE : 06th SEPTEMBER, 2019 ORAL ORDER:

1.

Heard the learned Counsel for the applicant. The tribe claim of the applicant is invalidated.

2.

Issue notice to the added party, returnable on 27.09.2019. 3.

Hamdast allowed.

4.

It is submitted that the applicant is admitted from All India 15 % quota. The contention of the applicant is that, at the time of admission, submission of validity was not mandatory, whereas the

2 925-CA-10438-2019 contention of the respondents appears to be otherwise. 5.

Till the next date, if the submission of the validity at the time of admission from 15% All India quota was not mandatory, then the admission of the applicant be protected. In case the submission of the validity certificate in terms of admission from 15% All India quota was mandatory, then this protection would not enure to the benefit of the applicant.

6.

The Civil Application for amendment is allowed. 7.

The Civil Application is disposed of.

[ ANIL S.KILOR ] [ S.V.GANGAPURWALA ] JUDGE JUDGE mta