Pratik Balaji Aloore v. The State Of Maharashtra Thorugh Its Secretary And Another

2025:BHC-AUG:23348-DB

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 995 WRIT PETITION NO. 10606 OF 2025 PRATIK BALAJI ALOORE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THORUGH ITS SECRETARY AND ANOTHER ....

Mr. Sagar S. Phatale, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. S. P. Sonpawale, AGP for the Respondents - State ....

CORAM : MANISH PITALE AND Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, JJ.

DATE : 26.08.2025 ORDER (PER: Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J.) :- 1.

The challenge in the present Petition is to the order dated 19.08.2025, passed by Respondent No.2 Scrutiny Committee, invalidating "Mannervarlu" Scheduled Tribe certificate of the Petitioner.

2.

Issue notice to the Respondents. The learned AGP waives notice on behalf of both the Respondents. 3.

The Petitioner is the aspiring student to secure admission to the professional course reserved for the Scheduled Tribe category. Therefore, considering the extreme urgency, the Petition is taken up for disposal at the stage of admission.

(( 2 )) 4.

Heard both the sides at length.

5.

As per the genealogical tree, Iranna Ramanna Aloore, great grandfather of the Petitioner has four sons, namely, Ramlu, Laxman, Balaji and Nandu. Sunita and Kavita are the daughters of Ramlu. Ashwini, Usha, Varsha and Ganesh are the children of Laxman. Priti and Pratik (present Petitioner) are the children of Balaji. Akshara and Arnav are the children of Nandu. 6.

On face of record, it appears that on 07.10.2005, the Scrutiny Committee has granted validity certificate of belonging to "Mannervarlu" scheduled tribe in favour of Nandu Gangaram Aloore, uncle of the Petitioner. On 21.08.2025, the Scrutiny committee has granted validity certificate of belonging to "Mannervarlu" scheduled tribe in favour of Ramlu Gangaram Aloore, uncle of the Petitioner. So also, this Court vide order dated 07.08.2023, in Writ Petition 9591 of 2023 (Kavita Ramlu Alure, Priti Balajirao Aloore and Usha Laxman Alure Vs. The State of Maharashtra), directed the Scrutiny Committee to issue conditional validity certificates of belonging to "Mannervalur" scheduled tribe, in favour of the Petitioners therein. The Respondent No.2 Scrutiny Committee, passed the impugned order

(( 3 )) and invalidated the scheduled tribe claim of the Petitioner on the ground that paternal blood relatives of the Petitioner, have obtained validity certificates on the basis of false and fabricated documents and concealment of original record and therefore, the validity holders were served with notices for revocation of their validities. However, it is not in dispute that the Respondent No.2 Scrutiny Committee has not invalidated or revoked the said validities in favour of the paternal blood relatives of the Petitioners.

7.

Since the paternal blood relatives of the Petitioners are having "Mannervarlu" Scheduled Tribe validity certificates, considering the parity, the Petitioner is also entitled to have "Mannervarlu" Scheduled Tribe validity certificates. However, such validity shall be subject to outcome of the decision in the proceeding in respect of blood relatives of the Petitioner, which the Respondent No.2 decided to re-open.

8.

Considering the law laid down in the cases of Mah. Adiwasi Thakur Jamat Swarakshan Samiti Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors.; AIR 2023 SC 1657, Shweta Balaji Isankar Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors., 2018 SCC Online Bom. 10341,

(( 4 )) Apoorva Vinay Nichale Vs. Divisional Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee No.1 and Ors., 2010(6) Mh.L.J. 401, wherein it has been concluded that when the biological father, biological siblings, biological uncle etc., are granted validity certificates, a candidate so related to them, cannot be deprived of a validity certificate. The present Petitioner is entitled to have the certificate of validity. 9.

The learned counsel appearing for the Petitioners submitted that the Scrutiny Committee has issued notice of revocation of validity certificates issued to the blood relatives of the Petitioners, namely, Ramlu Gangaram Aloore, Nandu Gangaram Aloore, Priti Balajirao Aloore and Usha Laxman Aloore. It is submitted that the said blood relatives of the Petitioners are voluntarily ready and willing to execute undertakings before the Respondent No.2 Scrutiny Committee, that they will cooperate in the decision regarding revocation of their validities. In these circumstances, it would be just and proper to direct Ramlu, Nandu, Priti and Usha, to file separate undertakings before Respondent No.2 Scrutiny Committee, stating that they will cooperate with the said Committee in respect of the tribe proceedings.

(( 5 )) 10.

The Petitioner appears to be the aspiring student for the professional course. Therefore, he is called upon to furnish undertaking that, in case, his caste validity certificate is invalidated by the Scrutiny Committee, in that event, he shall pay the tuition fees and admission fees applicable to the candidate from open category and no equity shall lie in his favour. In view of above discussion, the present Petition deserves to be allowed partly and the impugned order dated 19.08.2025, passed by Respondent No.2 Scrutiny Committee, needs to be quashed and set aside. Accordingly, we proceed to pass the following order:-

O R D E R

(i) The Writ Petition is partly allowed.

(ii) The impugned order dated 19.08.2025, passed by Respondent No.2 Scrutiny Committee is hereby quashed and set aside.

(iii) Respondent No.2 Scrutiny Committee shall immediately issue "Mannervarlu" Scheduled Tribe validity certificates in favour of the Petitioner, which shall be subject to following conditions:- (a) The caste validity certificates shall be subject to the outcome of the re-verification of the validity certificates of his blood relatives proposed by the Scrutiny Committee. (b) The Petitioner shall furnish an undertaking before the Registrar (Judicial) of this Court as well as before the Scrutiny Committee and the Educational Institution with

(( 6 )) whom he will take admission for professional course, indicating that in case his caste validity is revoked, he would deposit the tuition fees and other charges applicable to the candidates from open category.

(c) The Petitioner shall not claim any equity.

(d) The Petitioner shall cooperate with the Scrutiny Committee. (iv) Ramlu, Nandu, Priti and Usha, who are blood relatives of the Petitioner, shall furnish undertakings, immediately before Respondent No.2 Scrutiny Committee, stating that they will cooperate and appear before the Scrutiny Committee as and when called upon.

(v) The Writ Petition is disposed of. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.

[ Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J. ] [ MANISH PITALE, J. ] SMS