Archana Bharat Shinde v. The State Of Maharashtra Through The Secretary And Others

2024:BHC-AUG:15108-DB 1 wp 12068.23

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 12068 OF 2023 Archana Bharat Shinde .. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents Shri Ajinkya A. Joshi, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri R. S. Wani, A.G.P. for the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL AND SHAILESH P. BRAHME, JJ.

DATE : 20 JULY, 2024.

FINAL ORDER :

.

We have heard both the sides.

2.

By the impugned order the Divisional Deputy Director of Education has refused to grant approval to the petitioner's appointed stated to have been made on 25 October 2021 only on the ground that it was post Government Resolution dated 23 June 2017, which contemplated recruitment process through Pavitra Portal.

3.

It is pertinent to note that the impugned order in fact refused to consider the petitioner's proposal on merits. 4.

We have had an occasion in number of matters to

2 wp 12068.23 demonstrate as to how inspite of passing of the G. R. on 23.06.2017, actually work of Pavitra Portal was never streamlined. Even the Government had to issue a Government Resolution permitting the management to undertake recruitment for temporary period for enability in operating Pavitra Portal. Suffice for the purpose to refer to order dated 10.06.2024 in Writ Petition No. 13150 of 2022 in the matter of Shaikh Jaweria Khadarsab Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others.

5.

In the light of the above, impugned communication/order refusing to consider petitioner's proposal on merits would be not sustainable in law.

6.

Writ petition is allowed partly.

The impugned communication/order dated 13.07.2023 passed by the respondent No. 2/Deputy Director of Education, Aurangabad is quashed and set aside. The respondent No. 2/Deputy Director of Education shall consider the self same proposal on its own merits, but it shall not be rejected on the grounds mentioned in the impugned communication/order.

The decision shall be taken as expeditiously as possible and in any case within a period of six

(06) weeks from today.

[ SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J. ] [ MANGESH S. PATIL, J. ] bsb/July 24