← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/1944/2022disposed off

Jai Bhavani Shikshan Prasarak Mandal Through Its Treasurer And Another v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2025-11-27Hon'Ble Shri Justice Neeraj P. Dhote2 pages

2025:BHC-AUG:32702 969-WP-1945-2022.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 969 WRIT PETITION NO. 1945 OF 2022 Jai Bhavani Shikshan Prasarak Mandal Through Its Treasurer And Another

VERSUS

The State Of Maharashtra And Others ....

AND 970 WRIT PETITION NO. 1946 OF 2022 Jai Bhavani Shikshan Prasarak Mandal Through Its Treasurer And Another

VERSUS

The State Of Maharashtra And Others ....

AND WRIT PETITION NO. 1943 OF 2022 Jai Bhavani Shikshan Prasarak Mandal Through Its Treasurer And Another

VERSUS

The State Of Maharashtra And Others ...

AND WRIT PETITION NO. 1944 OF 2022 Jai Bhavani Shikshan Prasarak Mandal Through Its Treasurer And Another

VERSUS

The State Of Maharashtra And Others ....

AND WRIT PETITION NO. 1947 OF 2022 Jai Bhavani Shikshan Prasarak Mandal Through Its Treasurer And Another

VERSUS

The State Of Maharashtra And Others .....

Mr. Jadhav N.l., Advocate for the Petitioner/s Ms. A. S. Desmukh, AGP for the Respondents - State Mr. D. A. Karnik h/f Mr. V. J. Dhage, Advocate for Respondent No.3 .....

CORAM

:

NEERAJ P. DHOTE, J.

DATE :

27.11.2025

969-WP-1945-2022.odt PER COURT :

1.

These are the two [02] Petitions.

2.

The learned Advocate for the Petitioners submits that, he has instructions from the Petitioners that, due to efflux of time, the Petitions have become infructuous and the same may be disposed off. He submits that, three [03] Petitions bearing Nos.1943/2022, 1944/2022 and 1947/2022, which are identical Petitions, are not listed on today's Board. He submits that, those Petitions have also become infructuous due to efflux of time. He submits that, the said Petitions be taken on Board. 3.

In view of the above, the said Petitions bearing Nos. 1943/2022, 1944/2022 and 1947/2022 are taken on Board.

4.

The learned Advocate for the Respondents / Employees in all the Petitions is present.

5.

In view of the above submissions made by the learned Advocate for the Petitioners / Management, the Petitions stand disposed of as become infructuous due to efflux of time.

[NEERAJ P. DHOTE, J.] Sameer/November-2025