Usha Rambhau Gaikwad v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

WP/9701/2014/Group

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 9701 OF 2014 WITH CA/11100/2014 IN WP/9701/2014 WITH WP/9706/2014 VAISHALI VINAYAKRAO MOHITE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioners : Smt. V.H.Sangole h/f Shri A.M.Kulkarni AGP for Respondents 1 & 2 : Smt. Shelke S.D.

Advocate for Respondents 3 to 5 : Smt. Ashwini S. Hoge Patil ...

CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.

Dated: August 05, 2015 ...

PER COURT :- 1.

Respondent Nos.3, 4 and 5 have filed an affidavit-in-reply in both these petitions, dated 6.5.2015, through Shri Mohan Anand Kausadikar, who is the Child Development Project Officer, Paithan Prakalp-2, Aurangabad. 2.

In the first petition, the said affiant Shri Kausadikar has submitted on oath in paragraph Nos.9 and 10 as under:- "9.

The deponent says and submits that, respondent no.3,4 and 5 (are) ready to reinstate the petitioner as per earlier order of the respondent No.5.

10.

The deponent says and submits that, considering the above facts, the order passed by the Child Development Officer i.e. Respondent No.5 - of Zilla Parishad, Aurangabad is perfectly legal and proper."

WP/9701/2014/Group 3.

An identical statement has been made in paragraph Nos.9 and 10 in the affidavit-in-reply in the second petition as well. 4.

Smt. Hoge Patil, learned Advocate on behalf of respondent Nos.3 to 5 submits, in the light of these affidavits in reply, that both these petitioners are being reinstated and therefore, these petitions need not be kept pending.

5.

The learned Advocate on behalf of the petitioners submits that both these petitions can be disposed off in the light of paragraph Nos. 9 and 10 and the statements made in the affidavits-in-reply filed by the respondents 3 to 5.

6.

As such, in the light of the above statements and the contents of paragraph Nos.9 and 10 reproduced herein above, the grievance of the petitioners are redressed and hence both these petitions are disposed off. 7.

Pending Civil Applications, if any, also stand disposed off. ( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. ) ...

akl/d