Jagannath Hiraman Chavan v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

1 wp 10683.17

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 10683 OF 2017 Suhas Kashinath Jagtap .. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 10924 OF 2017 Jagannath Hiraman Chavan .. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents Shri D. M. Pingale, Advocate for the Petitioners. Shri S. B. Pulkundwar, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 to 5. Shri Ujwal Subhash Patil, Advocate for Respondent No. 6. CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA & A. M. DHAVALE, JJ.

DATE : 8 th February, 2018 PER COURT :

1.

Learned advocate for the respondent No. 6, on instructions, submits that the stone crusher of the respondent No. 6 is in closed condition and is not in operation.

2 wp 10683.17 2.

In view of the statement made by the respondent No. 6, nothing survives for adjudication.

3.

The writ petitions are disposed of. No costs. [A. M. DHAVALE, J.] [S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.] marathe/Feb.18