Dayanand Dattu Bondar v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Principal Secretary And Others

( 1 ) 957 wp 10156.22

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 957 WRIT PETITION NO.10156 OF 2022 RAVIKANT PANDURANG JADHAVAR

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND OTHERS AND 961 WRIT PETITION NO.10528 OF 2022 DAYANAND DATTU BONDAR

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. Thombre S.S.

AGP for Respondents/State : S/Shri V.M. Kagne & P.S. Patil Advocate for Respondents : Mr. A.B. Kadethankar ...

CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & Y.G. KHOBRAGADE, JJ.

DATE : 4th November, 2023 P.C. :- 1.

In both these cases, the FIR registered against the Petitioners indicates that proxy candidates appeared for the exams in place of these two Petitioners. Same is stated in the FIR as dummy candidate appeared on behalf of these Petitioners.

( 2 ) 957 wp 10156.22 2.

In view of the above, the learned advocate for the Petitioners submits that the Petitioners desire to withdraw this petition. If they are acquitted or if a '

B'

summary report is submitted or if the FIR is quashed under the orders of this Court, they would renew their request for considering them for recruitment since they are in the merit list and the Respondent-MHADA has stated in paragraph 10 and 11 that posts will be created to accommodate such candidates only after they are acquitted.

3.

In view of the above statement, these two petitions are disposed off with liberty.

[Y.G. KHOBRAGADE, J.] [RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.] mub