Hari Govindsingh S/O Kalyansingh Thakur v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

1 5-crwp1233-15.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1233 OF 2015 Hari Govindsingh s/o. Kalyansingh Thakur ..Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and anr.

..Respondents -- Mr.A.N.Sabnis, advocate i/b. Mr.P.P.Uttarwar, advocate for petitioner Mr.R.V.Dasalkar, APP for respondent no.1 - State Mr.Vivek Bhavthankar, advocate for respondent no.2 -- CORAM : M.T. JOSHI, J.

DATE : FEBRUARY 25, 2016 PER COURT :

Heard both sides.

2] Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. By consent of the parties, heard finally.

3] Aggrieved by the orders passed by the trial Court and learned Addl. Sessions Judge refusing to

2 5-crwp1233-15.odt hand over custody of the vehicle involved in the crime, present petition is filed.

4] The crime was registered for the offences punishable under Section 9, 39, 44, 48-A and 49 punishable under Section 51 and 52 of the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972. The learned Addl. Sessions Judge, while rejecting the application of the present petitioner, has observed that the appeal itself can be decided expeditiously.

5] Since the Sessions Court was of the view that the appeal itself can be decided expeditiously, present Criminal Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Nanded or learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Nanded, to see that the appeal is heard within a period of four months and disposed of within the said period.

3 5-crwp1233-15.odt 6] Rule is made absolute accordingly.

7] The parties to act on authenticated copy of this order.

[M.T. JOSHI, J.] kbp