← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/10737/2023disposed off

Babasaheb Paranjape Pratisthan Ambajogai Through Its Secretary And Another v. The State Of Maharashtra Through The Chief Secretary And Others

2023-09-20Hon'Ble Shri Justice Mangesh S. Patil,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme2 pages

23.WP.10737.2023.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.10737 OF 2023 1.

Babasaheb Paranjape Pratisthan, Ambajogai, Tq. Ambajogai, Dist. Beed through its Secretary Shri Sambhu Tukaram Lande 2.

Kartavya Matimand Mulinche Niwasi Vidyalaya, Ambajogai, Tq. Ambajogai Dist. Beed through its Headmistress ...

PETITIONERS

VERSUS

1.

The State of Maharashtra, through the Chief Secretary, Mantralaya, Vistar Bhavan, Shahid Bhagatsing Chowk, Madam Cama Road, Mumbai-32.

2.

The State of Maharashtra, through the Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Mantralaya, Vistar Bhavan, Shahid Bhagatsing Chowk, Madam Cama Road, Mumbai-32.

3.

The State of Maharashtra, through the Principal Secretary, Handicap Welfare Department, 31,32,35-A, Mittal Tower, A wing, 3rd floor, Barrister Rajni Patel Marg, Nariman Point, Mumbai 21.

4.

The Commissioner Handicap Welfare, Maharashtra State, Pune.

5.

The District Social Welfare Officer, ( deleted as per order dated 20.09.2023) Zilla Parishad, Beed, Ambedkar Bhavan, Beed, Tq. and Dist. Beed.

... Respondents 1/2

23.WP.10737.2023.odt ...

Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. Nimbalkar Aniruddha A. AGP for Respondent/State : Mr. A.A. Jagatkar ...

CORAM

: MANGESH S. PATIL & SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.J.

DATE : 20.09.2023 PER COURT :

Leave granted to delete the respondent No.5 at the petitioners' risk. The petitioners are merely seeking direction to sanction the post of staff member.

2.

The learned advocate for the petitioners submits that the petitioners would be satisfied if respondent Nos.1 to 3 consider and decide its communication dated 14.09.2022.

3.

We dispose of the writ petition directing the respondent Nos.1 to 3 to consider and take appropriate decision on the petitioners' communication dated 14.09.2022 if it is not already decided, as expeditiously as possible in any case within eight weeks. (SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.) (MANGESH S. PATIL, J.) habeeb 2/2