← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/1075/2024admittedallowedgrantedrule absolute

Ramrao Sheshrao Solunke v. 1. Sakharam Tukaram Dait And Others

2024-05-02Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More2 pages

2024:BHC-AUG:9237 917 CA-1075-2024

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 917 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1075 OF 2024 IN REJECTED CASE NO. 752 OF 2020 RAMRAO SHESHRAO SOLUNKE DIED THROUGH LRS MANDAKINI RAMRAO SOLUNKE AND OTHERS

VERSUS

SAKHARAM TUKARAM DAIT AND OTHERS ...

Mr. D.A. Mane h/f. Mr. Milind Patil - Advocate for Applicants ....

CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATE : 2nd May, 2024 PER COURT :

1.

Heard learned Counsel for the applicants.

2.

The applicants are seeking recalling of order dated 14th July, 2017 whereby registration of their Second Appeal has been rejected. The applicants also claims for condonation of delay of 1904 days. Learned Counsel for the applicants undertakes to remove all the office objections within the period of two weeks.

3.

However, in view of the huge delay of almost six years the application stands allowed in terms of prayer clauses 'A' and Pooja K.

1/2

917 CA-1075-2024 'B' subject to cost of Rs.3000/- (rupees Three Thousands only) to be paid to the Library, Advocates Association of High Court, Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad within the period of two weeks and also removal of all the office objections, if any, within the same period.

4.

The application is disposed of accordingly.

[ SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE ] JUDGE Pooja K.

2/2