Bombay High CourtCP/503/2017disposed offdismissed for default

Gajanan Balaji Damkondwar v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2017-09-13Hon'Ble Shri Justice R. M. Borde,Hon'Ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi1 pages

{1} cp503.17.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 503 OF 2017 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2174 OF 2015 Gajanan s/o Balaji Damkondwar Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & others Respondents Mr. C.K. Shinde, advocate for petitioner.

Mr. S.B. Yawalkar, A.G.P. for respondent no. 1. CORAM : R.M.BORDE & SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI, JJ.

DATE : 13th SEPTEMBER, 2017 PER COURT:

Perused the order passed by this Court on 19.09.2016. Prima facie, there does not appear to be violation of any direction issued by this Court. If at all, petitioner is not satisfied with the decision taken by the authority, it would be open for the petitioner to avail of alternate remedies available in law. There is no substance in the contempt petition. Contempt petition stands rejected.

SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI R.M.BORDE JUDGE JUDGE dyb