Pritam Subhash Pawar v. The State Of Maharashtra

2024:BHC-AUG:27018 BA 1678/24

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 46 BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1678 OF 2024 PRITAM SUBHASH PAWAR

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Granthi Manpreet Ajeet Singh APP for Respondent/State : Mr. B.A. Shinde ...

CORAM

: ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.

Dated : November 18, 2024 PER COURT :- 1.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned APP for the respondent-State.

2.

The applicant is seeking bail as he was arrested in connection with Crime No. 345/2023 dated 7.11.2023, registered with Itwara Police Station, District Nanded for the offences punishable under sections 302, 307, 384, 386, 294, 143, 146, 147, 148, 149 of Indian Penal Code and 4 r/w. 25 of the Arms Act and 135 of the Maharashtra Police Act. 3.

The learned counsel for the applicant has produced copies of order dated 22.07.2024 in Bail Application No. 1035/2024 and order dated 21.10.2024 in Bail Application No. 1704/2024 passed by this Court, granting bail to the applicants therein. The learned counsel submits that this Court has granted bail to the co-accused and the role of the applicant is similar to the co-accused to whom bail is granted by this Court. 4.

The learned AGP does not dispute the same. In view of the above, following order is passed :-

ORDER

i) Bail Application is allowed.

ii) Applicant - Pritam Subhash Pawar be released on bail, on furnishing

BA 1678/24 PB and SB of Rs. 50,000/-, with one solvent surety of the like amount, in the above crime for aforesaid offences, on the conditions that, (a) He shall not contact the co-accused.

(b) He shall not tamper with the prosecution witnesses. (c) He shall surrender his pass-port, if any.

(d) He shall furnish proof of his residence and cell number to the police, with an undertaking that he would not change it until the trial is concluded.

(e) He shall attend the trial on each and every effective date. (f) He should not leave the town without the leave of the trial Court.

iii) Needless to say, in case of violation of any of the aforesaid conditions, the bail granted to the applicant shall be liable to be cancelled. It is also clarified that the observations made in this order are limited to the disposal of the present bail application. The concerned Court shall proceed further in the matter without being influenced by the observations made hereinabove.

iv) The application stands disposed of.

( ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. ) ssc/