Bombay High CourtWP/10441/2014disposed offdismissed for default

Pandhari Nivrutti Mundhe And Another v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2015-09-28Hon'Ble Shri Justice R. M. Borde,Hon'Ble Shri Justice V.K. Jadhav1 pages

wp10441.14.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 10441 OF 2014 Pandhari s/o Nivrutti Mundhe & another .. PETITIONERS

VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra & others .. RESPONDENTS Mr. J.M. Murkute, advocate for petitioners.

Mrs. A.V. Gondhalekar, AGP for the State.

Mr. R.B. Ghule, advocate for respondents 4 and 5. ===== CORAM : R.M. BORDE & V. K. JADHAV, JJ.

DATE : 28TH SEPTEMBER, 2015.

PER COURT :

It would be open for the petitioners to avail of remedies available in law. In view of availability of alternate remedy for redressal of the grievance of petitioners, writ petition does not deserve to be entertained. Keeping the option to avail of alternate remedies available in law, open for the petitioners, writ petition stands disposed of. ( V. K. JADHAV ) ( R. M. BORDE ) JUDGE JUDGE dyb