Anil Kumar Navnath Giri v. Mohammad Yaseen Mohammad Rafik Naviwala

2024:BHC-AUG:18201 3193.2023APPLN.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

BENCH AT AURANGABAD.

109 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3193 OF 2023 ANIL KUMAR NAVNATH GIRI

VERSUS

MOHAMMAD YASEEN MOHAMMAD RAFIK NAVIWALA ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Garud Vijay Balvantrao Advocate for Respondent : Mr.Patil Dhananjay Shrikant ...

CORAM :

SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.

DATE :

12th August, 2024.

P.C.:

1.

Heard the learned counsel for the applicant and learned counsel for respondent.

2.

The learned counsel for the applicant, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw this application with liberty to examine the witness in support of his case. The learned counsel further submitted that yet the evidence of the applicant is not over, hence the applicant be permitted to examine himself and the witness in support of his case. 3.

Considering the submission of the learned counsel for the applicant, the application is allowed to withdraw with aforesaid liberty. The applicant is permitted to examine himself and any other witness in support of his contentions.

4.

The application is disposed of as withdrawn.

[ SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J. ] sga