Rauf Ali Ahmad Ali v. The State Of Maharashtra

(1) 908 Appln-3195.2023.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 908 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3195 OF 2023 IN APEAL/784/2023 RAUF ALI AHMAD ALI

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANOTHER ...

Mr. V.B. Patil, Advocate for the applicant.

Mr. R.D. Sanap, A.P.P. for respondent No.1 State. ...

CORAM :

SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATED :

26th October 2023.

ORDER:- 1.

Heard rival submissions.

2.

The concerned officer of M.S.E.D.C.L. despite service, remained absent. The Panel Advocates for M.S.E.D.C.L. have also not received any intimation for appearance on behalf of M.S.E.D.C.L.

3.

Vide order dated 06.09.2023, the interim relief of suspension of substantive sentence of imprisonment and release on bail is already granted. As such, the same is made absolute.

4.

Application is accordingly disposed of.

(SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.) vd_dhirde