← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/3484/2022delay condonatedrejected

Babarao @ Baburao Nagshetty Kumdale v. State Of Maharashtra Thr Collector, Latur And ANR

2022-08-12Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 933 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3484 OF 2022 IN FAST/28417/2021 WITH CA/3485/2022 IN FAST/29007/2021 BABARAO @ BABURAO NAGSHETTY KUMDALE

VERSUS

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR COLLECTOR, LATUR AND ANOTHER ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Chillarge Subhash S. AGP for Respondents - State : Mr. S. R.

Yadav - Lonikar Advocate for Respondent No. 2 : Mr. S. P. Sonpawale ...

CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATE : 12.08.2022 PER COURT :

The applicants in both the applications are seeking condonation of delay of 2067 days in challenging the impugned award for enhancement.

2.

The learned AGP as well as the learned counsel for respondent No.2 - acquiring body strongly opposed the applications. 3.

The learned counsel for the applicants submits that the delay can be condoned on the condition that applicants shall not claim any interest for the aforesaid period of delay.

4.

In view of the same and for the reasons recorded in the applications, the delay of 2067 days in both the applications stand condoned subject to condition that the applicants shall not claim any interest in respect of the aforesaid delay period. 5.

Undertakings to that effect filed by the concerned applicants, the applications are accordingly disposed of. 6.

The appeals be placed for admission after removal of office objections, if any.

(SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE .....

shp/-