Jaya Baban Muthe v. Bhaurao Mhatardeo Batule And ANR

1 1060,1062, 1063 ca 267-18+

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 1060 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.267 OF 2018 IN FAST/28945/2017 BABAN BABAJI MUTHE

VERSUS

BHAURAO MHATARDEO BATULE AND ANR ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. D. R. Jayabhar Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr. M. K. Goyanka ...

AND 1062 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2492 OF 2018 IN FAST/29200/2017 JAYA BABAN MUTHE

VERSUS

BHAURAO MHATARDEO BATULE AND ANR ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. D. R. Jayabhar Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr. M. K. Goyanka ...

AND 1063 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2895 OF 2018 IN FAST/29425/2017 PRAKASH @ VIAY BABAN MUTHE THR N.G. FATHER BABAN BABAJI MUTHE

VERSUS

BHAURAO MHATARDEO BATULE AND ANR ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. D. R. Jayabhar Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr. M. K. Goyanka ...

CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATED : 31/01/2023.

2 1060,1062, 1063 ca 267-18+ P. C. :

1.

Heard learned counsel for the applicants.

2.

The respective applicants are seeking condonation of delay period, which appears to be caused due to their poor financial condition. The learned counsel for respondent No.2 strongly opposed the application.

3.

Considering the statutory right of the applicants and a short period of delay, the applications are allowed and the delay periods in all these applications stand condoned subject to condition that the applicants shall not claim any interest for the periods of aforesaid delay and also for the delay in circulating the matter belatedly.

4.

The appeals be placed for admission after removal of office objections, if any.

5.

The applications are accordingly disposed of. ( SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J. ) VS Maind/-