Suniti Vitthal More And Another v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary And Others

2025:BHC-AUG:4203-DB 41 CA NO. 10240 OF 2024..odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 41 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10240 OF 2024 IN WP/14532/2023 SUNITI VITTHAL MORE AND ANOTHER

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Barlinge Sudhir Raghunath AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 to 5 : Mr. S. V. Hange ...

CORAM

:

MANGESH S. PATIL & PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR , JJ.

DATE : 12.02.2025 PER COURT :

.

We have heard learned advocate for the petitionerapplicant and the learned AGP. None present for other respondents, though duly served.

2.

By way of this Civil Application, restoration of the writ petition, which has been dismissed in default, has been sought with a prayer to condone the delay of 228 days.

3.

The nature of the dispute and the explanation assigned in the application pragmatically deserve the delay to be condoned and the writ petition is to be restored, however, not without the usual conditions.

1/2

41 CA NO. 10240 OF 2024..odt 4.

The application is allowed. The delay is condoned and the writ petition is restored subject to the petitioner depositing cost of Rs. 3,000/- in this Court and removes office objections, both within two weeks.

5.

If the compliance is made, list the petition for admission on 05.03.2025.

(PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.) (MANGESH S. PATIL, J.) jhs/ 2/2