← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/1628/2022delay condonatedrejected

Trimbak Sukhdev Jadhav v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS

2022-06-14Hon'Ble Shri Justice S. G. Dige2 pages

1628.22CA+

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 944 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1628 OF 2022 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO.27562 OF 2019 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1585 OF 2022 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO.27544 OF 2019 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1631 OF2022 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO.27560 OF 2019 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2692 OF 2022 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO.27550 OF 2019 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4007 OF 2022 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO.27547 OF 2019 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1779 OF 2022 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO.27556 OF 2019 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1782 OF 2022 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO.27564 OF 2019 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1773 OF 2022 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO.27553 OF 2019 ...

TRIMBAK SUKHDEV JADHAV

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTHERS ...

Advocate for Applicants in all applications : Mr.D.B.Bhange h/f. P.P.More AGP for Respondent-State in all applications : Mr.A.B.Chate ...

CORAM : S.G.DIGE, J.

DATE : 14.06.2022 P.C. :

1] Heard the learned counsel for the applicants and respondents.

1628.22CA+ 2] Considering the reasons mentioned in the Applications, delay is condoned. The applicants - appellants shall not claim the interest for delay period. 3] Appeals be registered subject to removal of office objections, if any.

4] Accordingly, all Civil Applications are disposed of.

[S.G.DIGE] JUDGE DDC