Bombay High CourtWP/8657/2011disposed offdismissed for default
Satya Sai Shikshan Prasarak Mandal Aurangabad Thr President v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR
2017-11-01Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sangitrao S. Patil,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sunil P. Deshmukh1 pages
1 WP-8657-11.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT B0MBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 8657 OF 2011 Satya Sai Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, Aurangabad .. Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra and another .. Respondents --- Mr. Ankush N. Nagargoje, Advocate for petitioner Ms. S. S. Raut, Asstt.Govt. Pleader for respondent no.1 Mr. K. M. Suryawanshi, Advocate for respondent no. 2 CORAM : SUNIL P. DESHMUKH AND SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ.
DATE : 1st November, 2017 ORDER :
1.
In view of further developments, learned counsel for petitioner states that the petition has become infructuous and can be disposed of as such.
2.
Writ petition, as such, is disposed of as infructuous. SANGITRAO S. PATIL SUNIL P. DESHMUKH JUDGE JUDGE pnd