← Library
Bombay High CourtREVN/72/2023rejected at admission stage

Vinod Gunderao Bhande v. Anita W/O. Vinod Bhande

2024-01-08Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay A. Deshmukh2 pages

2024:BHC-AUG:281 72.2023REV -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 53 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 72 OF 2023 VINOD GUNDERAO BHANDE

VERSUS

ANITA W/O. VINOD BHANDE ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Lavte Amar Vinayakrao Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Dhanure Bramhanand M. ...

CORAM : SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.

DATED : 8th JANUARY, 2024.

PER COURT :- 1.

This revision is directed against the order dated 07.12.2021 passed by the Family Court, Latur in Petition No. E-65/2019. The revision is filed by the husband challenging the quantum of maintenance amount of Rs.12,000/- per month. Admittedly, the husband is a teacher and in his cross-examination, he has admitted that he is getting salary of Rs.62,000/- per month. 2.

The learned advocate for the applicant submitted that the applicant's parents are depending upon him and he had borne their expenses towards illtreatment of Rs.1,00,000/-. The maintenance amount is huge. He submitted that the reasons and findings of the learned trial Court are not legal and correct. He prayed for allowing this revision and reducing the amount of maintenance. 3.

The learned advocate for the respondent strongly objected

72.2023REV -2the application and pointed out the observations of the trial Court in which it is observed that father of this revision applicant was pensioner and he is no more, which is observed in para 29 of the impugned judgment.

4.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as grounds raised in this revision, it appears that the learned trial Court has given sound and convincing reasons and reasonable amount of maintenance is awarded to the wife, considering the status of the parties and need. Thus, there is no illegality, perversity to interfere in the impugned judgment. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the application deserves to be rejected. It is accordingly rejected.

5.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the respondent is compelled to face this revision, therefore, the applicant shall pay costs of Rs.5,000/- to the respondent. The costs shall be deposited in the trial Court/Executing Court within two weeks. (SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.) sga