Badasingh Dharamsingh Barnala Alias Badalsingh Dharamsingh Barnala v. The State Of Maharashtra

2025:BHC-AUG:37338 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1738 OF 2025 BADASINGH DHARAMSINGH BARNALA ALIAS BADALSINGH DHARAMSINGH BARNALA

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. H. V. Tungar APP for Respondents-State : Mr. S. M. Ganachari ...

CORAM : SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.

Date : 1st December, 2025 ORDER :- 1.

The applicant has approached this Court seeking regular bail in connection with FIR bearing Crime No. 22 of 2025 registered with Chopada Rural Police Station, Jalgon for the offences punishable under Section 109, 110, 132, 121(1), 137(2), 189(2), 189(4), 190, 191(2), 191(3), 115(2), 117(2), 118(1), 118(2) of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, alongwith Sections 3 and 7 read with Section 25 of the Indian Arms Act and Sections 37(1) and 37(3) of the Maharashtra Police Act.

2.

Heard the learned counsel for the applicant and learned APP for the State.

3.

Upon going through the FIR, it prima facie indicates the

-2applicant has made assault on the Police Officer. As a result of the same, the Police Officer has suffered certain injuries. The same is evident from the Injury Certificate produced before this Court. 4.

Perusal of record prima facie indicates that the present applicant has proactively participated in the commission of offence against the Police Officers which of a serious nature. The impunity with which the applicant alongwith other accused persons participated in the commission of offence and in the process has severely assaulted the Police Officers, the injuries sustained by the Police Officers are prima facie evident from the record made available.

5.

These acts of applicant would further paralyse the situation of law and order. Having participated in such serious act of assaulting to Police Officers even the rule of parity would not available and applicable to the present applicant since the role of the applicant in participation of offence is rather specific. 6.

Apart from the aforesaid aspect, record shows that the applicant is involved in several other offenses of similar nature, which are as under :-

-3Sr.

No.

Crime Number Police Station Offences 1.

Crime No. 179 of 2022 Varala Police Station Sec. 3 read with Sec. 25 of Indian Arms Act 2.

Crime No. 154 of 2021 Varala Police Station Sec. 3 read with Sec. 25 of Indian Arms Act 3.

Crime No. 408 of 2023 Annapurana Police Station Section 380 and 457 of IPC 7.

The aforesaid record prima facie sufficiently indicates and establishes that the applicant has criminal antecedents and is being prosecuted for the same. Thus, considering the material on record and the pendency of the cases against the Applicant, the application for bail deserves no consideration. 8.

Accordingly, the bail application is rejected. (SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.) Omkar Joshi