Maroti Ramrao Banbare And ANR v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS

(1) 935 CA-2674.2022.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 935 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2674 OF 2022 IN FAST/27648/2019 MAROTI RAMRAO BANBARE AND ANOTHER

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS AND 936 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2693 OF 2022 IN FAST/27638/2019 DHONDIBA HULBA KAMBLE (DIED) THR LRS BALAJI

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Mr. L.C. Patil, Advocate for the applicants.

Mr. R.D. Raut and Mr. D.J. Patil, AGPs for respondents/State. Mr. A.M. Phule, Advocate for respondent No. 2. ...

CORAM :

SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATED :

26 FEBRUARY 2025.

ORDER:- 1.

Heard rival submissions 2.

The applications are for condonation of delay of only 21 and 23 days respectively in filing first appeals. The learned Counsel for the respondent No.3 Acquiring Body, despite appearance, remained absent. As such, considering short periods of delay, the applications allowed in terms of prayer clause (B) and disposed of accordingly.

3.

The appeals be registered after removal of office objections, if any.

(SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.) VD_Dhirde