← Library
Bombay High CourtMCA/268/2024application allowed

Parwati Ashish Bashal v. Ashish @ Dhanjay Balbhadure Bashal

2025-10-10Hon'Ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant3 pages

( 1 )

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 955 MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 268 OF 2024 Parwati Ashish Bashal

VERSUS

Ashish @ Dhanjay Balbhadure Bashal ...

Mr. Akshay Subhash Tilve, Advocate for Applicant. Mr. Onkar M. Joshi, Advocate for Respondent.

CORAM : KISHORE C. SANT, J.

DATE : 10th OCTOBER 2025.

PC :- 1.

Heard the learned Advocates for the parties.

2.

This application is moved by the wife seeking transfer of proceeding bearing Hindu Marriage Petition No.218 of 2022 pending in the Court of learned Judge, Family Court Amravati to the Court of learned Judge, Family Court at Aurangabad.

3.

This application is vehemently opposed by the learned Advocate for the Respondent.

4.

The learned Advocate for the applicant submits that presently the

( 2 ) applicant-wife is residing at Jadhavwadi, Chh. Sambhajinagar with her old aged parents. The distance between two places is around 320 k.m.. She find it difficult to travel to Nagpur as there is no one to accompany her to go to Amravati. The wife has initiated a proceeding at Aurangabad bearing PWDVA No.802 of 2019 under the Domestic Violence Act for protection and alimony where the husband has already appeared. She thus prays for allowing the application. 5.

Considering the convenience of the applicant-wife, this Court finds that it would be in the interest of justice to allow the application. Hence, the following order:-

ORDER

(i) Misc. Civil Application stands allowed.

(ii) The proceedings of Hindu Marriage Petition No.218 of 2022 pending in the Court of learned Judge, Family Court Amravati stands transferred to the Court of learned Judge, Family Court at Aurangabad. (iii) After transfer of the proceeding, the applicant shall not seek unnecessary adjournments. In case the Trial Court finds that the

( 3 ) adjournments are unnecessarily sought, the Trial Court may deal with such application, so as to compensate the respondent-husband, if he personally remains present.

(iv) After transfer the learned Trial Judge shall try to dispose off the proceeding as early as possible and preferably within one year from the date of transfer.

(v) Whenever request is made by the respondent-husband seeking permission to appear through video conferencing, the same shall be considered liberally by the trial Court.

(vi) With this, Misc. Civil Application stands disposed off. [KISHORE C. SANT, J.]