← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/9522/2014disposed off

Shreekshetra Mahurgad Vikas Mandal Nanded v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2025-12-02Hon'Ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi,Hon'Ble Justice Vaishali Patil-Jadhav2 pages

2025:BHC-AUG:33254-DB 1 934-WP-9522-14.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 9522 OF 2014 SHREEKSHETRA MAHURGAD VIKAS MANDAL, NANDED

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Ms. N. B. Kamble, AGP for Respondent/State Mr. Amol G. Vasmatkar, Advocate for Respondent No.3 Mr. S. V. Adwant, Advocate for Respondent No.11 ...

WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8219 OF 2024 IN WP/1359/2018 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9494 OF 2025 IN WP/1359/2018 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5558 OF 2024 IN WP/1359/2018 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5485 OF 2024 IN WP/9522/2014 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7801 OF 2024 IN WP/9522/2014 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7784 OF 2024 IN WP/1359/2018 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1359 OF 2018 CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND VAISHALI PATIL JADHAV, JJ.

DATE : 02nd DECEMBER, 2025 PER COURT :

1.

In both these petitions the petitioner party-in-person is consistently absent since 04/11/2025. On 25/11/2025, by way of indulgence the matters were adjourned for today. Today, when the SVH

2 934-WP-9522-14.odt matters were called out in the 6rst session, considering the absence of party-in-person those were kept in the second session. When the matters were called out in the second session, the party-in-person is absent.

2.

It appears that the party-in-person has lost interest in prosecuting the matters. Both the writ petitions are, therefore, dismissed for want of prosecution. Pending civil applications also stand disposed of.

(VAISHALI PATIL JADHAV, J.) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.) SVH